Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 19
March 19
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dorel zaharia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be from here:
http://cupatimisoreana.gsp.ro/stiri/182/zaharia-vom-da-totul-pentru-calificarea-in-finala-cupei-romaniei.htm Eeekster (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dani coman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Adrian Pit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kalfonso.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly a non-free image, disputing license tag. — TAnthonyTalk 02:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Brianskosana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sports photo. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dallasjohnson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sports photo. Likely copyrighted, judging by provided source. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jpduplessis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sports photo. Likely copyrighted, judging by provided source. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TGschool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Grain and lighting suggest that photo is a screencapture of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ICParty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IRMIran.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 19:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sage rubiks cube.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image my have non-free elements the browser the website etc so i am puting it up for discussion. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:At sag 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Upton cate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Blanchett oscars 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FairlyOddCoaster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2D/3D art logo - US FoP not applicable as artwork? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Snoopy Kennedy.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sculpture - No FoP in US for such unless work of fedral Govt. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: delete. File available on Commons under File:Erie Intermodal Center.jpg. — ξxplicit 03:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Intermodal.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- US Architecture post 1992? Fop Applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm not sure where you get 1992 from. 1990 was when architectural works themselves were first protected under U.S. Law. That said, there are specific exemptions from this law for pictorial representations of said architectural works (i.e., Freedom of Panorama). IronGargoyle (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per IronGargoyle. Spot on! — BQZip01 — talk 07:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- Note after closure: The result of the debate was, in reality: Keep. The file was moved to the Commons and is available under File:Erie Intermodal Center.jpg. — BQZip01 — talk 05:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]